S.D. Cal. · No. 3:26-cv-04762
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited Connector, LLCsource ↗ filed by Pacific Trial Attorneys, APC · Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro · No. 3:26-cv-04762 · 28:1332 Diversity Action · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split: Bayhealth confidentiality claim survived MTD and Gunnar Optiks BIPA claim was revived on remand, but Integris shows state-law data-sharing claims often left 'unclear' pending discovery. Suited Connector is a small lead-gen firm, unlike the tech giants in most settlement comparables. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on duty-of-confidentiality theory, relevant if Suited Connector captured/recorded consumer data without consent. Main risk: Case could stall like Integris (claims left 'unclear') or founder on lack of a clear duty/consent theory absent stronger CIPA-specific facts. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $145K–$6M Small sample of directly on-point rulings; defendant size/class scope inferred from thin web signals, not verified revenue or lead-volume data. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Cal. | 2026-08-19 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |