E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-06110
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.source ↗ filed by Keller Postman LLC · No. 2:26-cv-06110 · 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/tracking rulings split: Bayhealth found a duty of confidentiality survives MTD, while Integris and LabCorp left claims 'unclear' pending fact development. Gunnar Optiks shows even facially strong statutory claims often survive only on remand, not outright win, signaling fact-intensive early litigation. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider tracking-tech disclosure claim survived MTD, closely mirroring pharma-website tracking theory here. Main risk: Integris-style removal/jurisdictional fights and LabCorp-style 'unclear' materiality/causation rulings could stall or narrow claims before class certification. This defendant: Six separate Privacy & Wiretap filings against BI suggest coordinated plaintiff strategy likely heading toward consolidation/MDL treatment. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $12.50M–$140M Small comparable sample, no defendant-specific settlement data yet, and six parallel filings could consolidate and shift both class size and payout structure. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-20 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |