← Records

Brito v. FRYD DEVELOPERS LTD.

S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25683

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
FRYD DEVELOPERS LTD.source ↗
filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Darrin Phillip Gayles · No. 1:26-cv-25683 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Case comparables ▾
ADA claims survived/affirmed in Holmes v. Bax and fee entitlement was recognized in Price v. Diab, suggesting courts are receptive to ADA accessibility theories, but neither involves website/facility accessibility against a small developer like Fryd.
Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms default judgment/injunctive relief plus fee-shifting is achievable even without a contested merits trial.
Main risk: ADA Title III provides no compensatory/statutory damages, so recovery is capped at injunctive relief and attorney's fees, limiting monetary exposure (per Price v. Diab framework).
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$200K
No settlements, verdicts, or defendant history on record; estimate relies on generic ADA Title III litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityS.D. Fla.2026-08-20$2K–$200K
rough EV