D. Maryland · No. 1:26-cv-03327
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torrid LLCsource ↗ filed by The Toppe Firm, LLC · Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin · No. 1:26-cv-03327 · 28:1441 Notice of Removal · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims tied to tracking tech show split outcomes: Doe v. Bayhealth survived on confidentiality duty theory, and Gunnar Optiks (BIPA) was revived on appeal, but Integris Health saw state claims deemed unclear and federal removal denied, showing fact-intensive dismissal risk. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. - survived MTD on provider-duty theory, closest analog to consumer tracking/disclosure claims against Torrid. Main risk: Dismissal on standing/consent grounds similar to LabCorp's narrow reading or Integris' 'unclear' state claims outcome. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $7.50M–$90M Small comparable sample, no prior Torrid litigation history, and class size is speculative absent discovery on actual tracking-tech user counts. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Maryland | 2026-08-20 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |