E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05109
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adore Brooklyn, Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Office of Jennifer E. Tucek, PC · Judge Diane Gujarati · No. 1:26-cv-05109 · 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility claims generally survive motions to dismiss per Holmes v. Bax's affirmance of ADA violations, and Price v. Diab shows plaintiffs can secure default judgments/fees even against small defendants. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows ADA plaintiffs often win via default judgment plus fee-shifting even against unresponsive small businesses. Main risk: Single small jewelry retailer likely lacks resources/insurance, raising default-judgment risk but limiting recoverable damages per Holmes v. Bax's vacated injunction issue. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$40K No directly on-point ADA accessibility rulings or settlements in dataset; estimate relies on general EDNY small-business ADA litigation patterns. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-20 | $3K–$40K rough EV |