← Records

Otto v. Adore Brooklyn, Inc.

E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05109

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Adore Brooklyn, Inc.source ↗
filed by Law Office of Jennifer E. Tucek, PC · Judge Diane Gujarati · No. 1:26-cv-05109 · 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights · view case timeline →
Case comparables ▾
ADA accessibility claims generally survive motions to dismiss per Holmes v. Bax's affirmance of ADA violations, and Price v. Diab shows plaintiffs can secure default judgments/fees even against small defendants.
Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows ADA plaintiffs often win via default judgment plus fee-shifting even against unresponsive small businesses.
Main risk: Single small jewelry retailer likely lacks resources/insurance, raising default-judgment risk but limiting recoverable damages per Holmes v. Bax's vacated injunction issue.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$40K
No directly on-point ADA accessibility rulings or settlements in dataset; estimate relies on general EDNY small-business ADA litigation patterns. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityE.D.N.Y2026-08-20$3K–$40K
rough EV