N.D. Ill. · No. 1:26-cv-10068
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradshaw Taylor USA Inc.source ↗ filed by Horowitz Law, Pllc · Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman · No. 1:26-cv-10068 · 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA claims fared well on merits in Holmes v. Bax (affirmed) but fee-shifting outcomes are inconsistent, as Price v. Diab reversed a fee award despite a favorable injunction. No case here directly addresses accessibility merits for a retail defendant like Bradshaw Taylor. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — shows even a plaintiff who wins injunctive relief can lose fee-shifting entitlement, capping recovery upside. Main risk: Title III yields injunctive relief only, not damages; fee award (main monetary component) can be reversed as in Price v. Diab. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$12K No settlements, verdicts, or defendant history on record; estimate relies on general ADA Title III litigation patterns, not case-specific data. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | N.D. Ill. | 2026-08-20 | $3K–$12K rough EV |