E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05098
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castillo & Sons Incsource ↗ filed by Law Office of Jennifer E. Tucek, PC · Judge Marcia M. Henry · No. 1:26-cv-05098 · 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility claims often survive motions to dismiss (Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment), but Title III suits yield no damages—only injunctive relief and fees (Price v. Diab). Small-business defendant with unclear entity identity adds uncertainty. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA plaintiffs recover injunctive relief and attorney's fees as prevailing parties, not damages, shaping likely case value. Main risk: Title III of ADA provides no compensatory damages, capping recovery to injunctive relief/fees regardless of survival (per Price v. Diab). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$45K No settlement or verdict data specific to ADA accessibility; defendant identity ambiguous across multiple small businesses, limiting reliability. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-20 | $3K–$45K rough EV |