S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07059
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winx Health Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07059 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are thin and not squarely on-point: Price v. Diab shows ADA default judgments plus fee awards are sustainable, and Holmes v. Bax affirms ADA violations can survive summary judgment, but the OLC ECOA opinion is analogous only in showing courts scrutinize statutory text/intent closely. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms ADA accessibility plaintiffs who secure judgment/injunctive relief can also recover fees, raising defendant's exposure beyond injunctive compliance. Main risk: Single-plaintiff or tester-driven suit could still trigger fee-shifting liability per Price v. Diab even without broad class certification. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$488K Comparables are largely non-ADA-website-specific and sample size is too small for reliable precision; figures are directional only. · grounded in 3 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-19 | –$488K rough EV |