S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07058
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mam Usa Holding Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07058 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables (ECOA, Price v. Diab, Holmes v. Bax) are only loosely analogous ADA/civil-rights rulings, not accessibility-specific merits decisions; two of three affirmed underlying ADA-type claims, suggesting courts are receptive to well-pled accessibility claims but fee/remedy scope remains contested. Key precedent: Price v. Diab shows ADA plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief can be 'prevailing parties' entitled to fees, reinforcing incentive/viability of accessibility suits even absent damages. Main risk: Most ADA Title III claims yield only injunctive relief and fee-shifting, not damages, capping recovery similar to Price v. Diab's fee-only outcome. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$75K No accessibility-specific rulings, settlements, or verdicts on record; estimate relies on general ADA litigation patterns, not case-specific data. · grounded in 3 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-19 | $5K–$75K rough EV |