← Records

Macon v. Mr. and Mrs. Crab Lakeland Inc.

M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02417

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Mr. and Mrs. Crab Lakeland Inc.source ↗
filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 8:26-cv-02417 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Case comparables ▾
Comparables show ADA accessibility claims often survive dismissal and can produce injunctive relief (Price v. Diab; Holmes v. Bax), but these are single-plaintiff Title III 'tester' suits with no statutory damages, only injunctive relief and fee-shifting exposure.
Key precedent: Price v. Diab establishes prevailing-party fee entitlement even on default/injunctive resolution, shaping likely settlement pressure here.
Main risk: Mootness/standing challenges if defendant remediates quickly, similar to risk implicit in Holmes where injunctive relief was vacated for inadequate-remedy analysis
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K
No settlement or verdict data specific to this defendant; estimate relies on general Title III ADA litigation patterns, not per-member statutory damages. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityM.D. Fla.2026-08-18$2K–$10K
rough EV