S.D. Fla. · No. 0:26-cv-62291
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity Services, Inc.source ↗ filed by Ethan Babb Law Firm · Judge Melissa Damian · No. 0:26-cv-62291 · 28:1441 Notice of Removal · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital shows FCRA furnisher claims are frequently dismissed for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, while Askins v. CRST shows disclosure-based FCRA claims can survive on bare statutory violation theory. Clarity Services faces a mix of dismissal-prone and viable claim types depending on which FCRA provision is invoked. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=8 Trader Joe's $7.40M · Xactus $2.40M · Amazon.com Inc. an $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$301 median · $102–$500 (n=2) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - directly analogous FCRA furnisher case showing multiple counts dismissed for no private right of action or insufficient facts. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient factual allegations, as in Minano. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40K–$12.50M Six prior filings suggest repeat individual suits, not confirmed class action; class size and value are speculative absent case-specific data. · grounded in 10 rulings, 8 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-18 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |