S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07024
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Munchkin, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07024 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are only loosely on-point: Price v. Diab affirmed default judgment/injunctive relief for an ADA accessibility claim but reversed fee entitlement, showing courts split on ancillary remedies even when liability is established. The ECOA disparate-impact opinion is not an ADA case and offers little direct guidance. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - confirms ADA accessibility liability can stick via default judgment/injunction, but fee-shifting outcomes are unpredictable. Main risk: ADA Title III alone provides no damages, only injunctive relief and possible fees, which per Price v. Diab can be denied even after liability is found. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$100K Extremely thin comparable set (2 rulings, no settlements/verdicts, no prior Munchkin history) forces broad, low-confidence ranges; true class size and damages model unclear absent case-specific complaint details. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-18 | –$100K rough EV |