C.D. Cal. · No. 8:26-cv-02282
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keed LLCsource ↗ filed by Open Access Law APC · Judge Kenly Kiya Kato · No. 8:26-cv-02282 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split: Doe v. Bayhealth's confidentiality claim survived MTD while Integris saw removal denied but state claims left unclear, showing courts are receptive to healthcare privacy theories but outcomes are fact-dependent. Gunnar Optiks shows courts reluctant to dismiss at pleading stage when factual questions on data collection remain. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google Assistant $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider duty of confidentiality analogous to physician-patient relationship supports survival of similar claims here. Main risk: Dismissal on threshold issues (standing, consent, or narrow statutory reading) as seen in LabCorp's restrictive interpretation of billing/disclosure obligations Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $125K–$1.50M Small defendant with no prior litigation history; class size is inferred from indirect web signals, not confirmed patient records. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-17 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |