E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05010
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reprise AI LLCsource ↗ filed by The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi · No. 1:26-cv-05010 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $28M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall/text claims are frequently dismissed on technical grounds (Howard, Perrong, Hulce), but claims with concrete injury and clear autodialer/consent facts survive (League of Women Voters v. Kramer). Comparable settlements $28M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising $32.42M Key precedent: Hulce v. Zipongo (7th Cir.) — shows even routine marketing texts can escape TCPA liability if not deemed 'telephone solicitations', a live risk for Reprise's B2B demo outreach. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead ATDS/prerecorded-voice use or lack of concrete injury, as in Howard and Perrong Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$150K Defendant is a small, low-revenue startup; no prior litigation history; class size and conduct scope are speculative from web signals alone. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-17 | $28M–$76M comparable settlements |