Rosado-Wright v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. · No. 5:26-cv-08458

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Apple Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Offices Jason M. Ingber · No. 5:26-cv-08458 · 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $90M–$586M ▾ Comparable rulings are split: consumer/UCL claims like Guthrie and Citizens of Humanity failed at certification or on the merits, while CSPA-style deceptive practices claims (Cetorelli) succeeded; no false-advertising ruling in the set directly mirrors Apple's product-marketing context. Comparable settlements $90M–$586M median $90M · n=10 Western Union $586M · Toyota Industries $436M · Credit Glory $200M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $20–$20 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M Key precedent: Guthrie v. Transamerica — shows CA courts often deny certification when claims require individualized reliance/communication proof, a likely defense theme for Apple. Main risk: Certification denial due to individualized issues (as in Guthrie) or standing/causation dismissal similar to Hernandez-Castrodad's jurisdictional bar. This defendant: Apple faces recurring consumer and privacy litigation (Alvarez, Ramirez, BOOMCLOUD) suggesting persistent exposure but mixed outcomes. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $11.25M–$360M Single realized per-member data point and no directly on-point false-advertising rulings for Apple make this estimate highly speculative; actual outcome depends heavily on specific product claims and certification posture. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts	Filing	False Advertising	N.D. Cal.	2026-08-14	$90M–$586M comparable settlements