E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05908
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.source ↗ filed by Keller Postman LLC · Judge KAI N. SCOTT · No. 2:26-cv-05908 · 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparable health-privacy tracking claims split: Bayhealth's breach-of-confidentiality claim survived MTD while Integris's federal officer removal argument failed and state privacy claims remain unclear; Gunnar Optiks shows factual issues often block early dismissal. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google Assistant $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — health-data tracking confidentiality claim survived MTD, closest analog to BI's likely pixel/tracking exposure. Main risk: Dismissal on loss-causation/materiality grounds as in LabCorp, or failure to show unauthorized disclosure akin to Integris's unresolved state claims. This defendant: Six prior privacy/wiretap filings against BI suggest a wave of copycat suits, likely tied to website tracking technology across multiple plaintiffs. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5M–$60M Small comparable sample and unclear class definition make this a rough directional estimate, not a precise forecast. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-14 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |