E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05824
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by Vullings Law Group, LLC · Judge Kelley Brisbon Hodge · No. 2:26-cv-05824 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital shows courts frequently dismiss FCRA furnisher claims for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, while Askins v. CRST confirms bare statutory violations can still confer standing. TransUnion's $40M Ninth Circuit jury verdict shows real trial exposure once claims survive threshold motions. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=8 Trader Joe's $7.40M · Xactus $2.40M · Amazon.com Inc. an $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$301 median · $102–$500 (n=2) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital (D.D.C.) - most analogous FCRA furnisher theory, dismissed most counts for lacking private right of action or insufficient factual specificity. Main risk: Dismissal at pleading stage for failure to state plausible FCRA violation, mirroring Minano's dismissal of multiple counts without prejudice. This defendant: Six concurrent FCRA/FDCPA filings against TransUnion indicate high-volume repeat litigation exposure and possible systemic reporting issues. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40K–$12.50M Single filing with no class certification yet; class size and recovery are speculative extrapolations from unrelated FCRA settlements. · grounded in 10 rulings, 8 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-13 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |