S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06907
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ink & Alloy LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06907 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA website-accessibility suits in S.D.N.Y. often survive dismissal when paired with NYC Human Rights Law damages claims, but circuit guidance on website coverage remains unsettled. Price v. Diab shows fee-shifting risk even after default judgment, raising defendant exposure beyond injunctive relief. Key precedent: Price v. Diab - confirms ADA plaintiffs can recover attorney's fees as prevailing parties even via default judgment, increasing litigation cost pressure on small defendants. Main risk: Small single-location/e-commerce defendant may lack resources to litigate; risk of default judgment plus fee-shifting per Price v. Diab. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1K–$30K No direct settlement or verdict data for this defendant or theory; estimate relies on general SDNY ADA web-accessibility litigation patterns. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-13 | $1K–$30K rough EV |