S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06908
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nextten Stauer, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06908 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA accessibility claims can succeed via default judgment with injunctive relief, but fee entitlement remains contested even after liability is established. No direct precedent here addresses merits of the specific access barrier alleged against Nextten Stauer. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - shows ADA accessibility claims often resolve via default/injunction, but attorney's fee recovery is not automatic even after prevailing. Main risk: Standing/mootness challenges or defendant remediating site pre-litigation, echoing fee-shifting disputes seen in Price v. Diab. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$38K Extremely thin comparable set (2 rulings, no settlements/verdicts, no prior defendant history); figures are illustrative, not statistically grounded. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-13 | $2K–$38K rough EV |