Bulgin v. Bozzuto & Associates, Inc.

N.D. Cal. · No. 3:26-cv-08381

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Bozzuto & Associates, Inc.source ↗ filed by Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC · No. 3:26-cv-08381 · 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾ Comparable privacy/wiretap rulings split: Doe v. Bayhealth allowed confidentiality claims to survive while Integris Health found similar health-data-sharing claims 'unclear' and dismissed removal grounds; Clements v. Gunnar Optiks shows courts often defer dismissal to factual record. No direct wiretap statute ruling in this set raises uncertainty for Bozzuto's CIPA-type claim. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on confidentiality theory analogous to third-party data-sharing claims relevant to Bozzuto's alleged tracking practices. Main risk: Dismissal on standing/consent grounds similar to Integris Health, where 'acting under' or third-party sharing claims were deemed unclear or dismissed at pleading stage. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $250K–$4.50M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no direct Bozzuto-specific rulings or settlements; class size is inferred from company scale, not case filings. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts	Filing	Privacy & Wiretap	N.D. Cal.	2026-08-12	$30M–$725M comparable settlements