E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05796
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.source ↗ filed by LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS S SCHWARTZ · Judge Joshua David Wolson · No. 2:26-cv-05796 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ shows FCRA furnisher claims often survive only in part, with many counts dismissed for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading. Askins shows disclosure-based FCRA claims can survive standing challenges, but most other comparables are factually unrelated to FCRA/Experian disputes. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=8 Trader Joe's $7.40M · Xactus $2.40M · Amazon.com Inc. an $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$301 median · $102–$500 (n=2) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - directly analogous FCRA furnisher case showing partial dismissal is the modal outcome. Main risk: Partial dismissal for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano, could gut multiple counts early. This defendant: Multiple individual FCRA filings against Experian (Harding, Fuller, Butler, Stanislaus, Kancharla, Henderson) suggest repeat individual litigation, not consolidated class exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$1K Comparable rulings are mostly unrelated case types; sample too thin and mismatched to reliably predict this specific FCRA/Experian outcome. · grounded in 10 rulings, 8 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-12 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |