E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05791
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.source ↗ filed by LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS S SCHWARTZ · Judge Chad Francis Kenney Sr. · No. 2:26-cv-05791 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ shows FCRA furnisher claims routinely dismissed for no private right of action or insufficient pleading, while Askins and Wright show disclosure/procedural FCRA claims can survive if well-pled. Experian faces repeat individual FCRA suits (Harding, Fuller, Butler, etc.), suggesting recurring but fact-specific disputes rather than uniform liability. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=8 Trader Joe's $7.40M · Xactus $2.40M · Amazon.com Inc. an $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$301 median · $102–$500 (n=2) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — FCRA furnisher claims dismissed for lacking private right of action/insufficient pleading, a common defense Experian will raise. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead furnisher-specific willfulness/negligence under FCRA, as in Minano This defendant: Multiple recent individual FCRA filings against Experian (6 cited) suggest recurring consumer disputes, not necessarily class-wide pattern Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$1.12M Unclear if filing is individual or class action; no complaint-specific facts provided, so estimate is highly speculative and wide-ranging · grounded in 10 rulings, 8 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-12 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |