S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25350
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akris, Inc.source ↗ filed by Brasil Brasil PA · No. 1:26-cv-25350 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and prevailing-party status via default judgment, favoring accessibility claims, but the fee-award reversal shows courts scrutinize fee entitlement closely. No ADA-specific settlement or verdict data exists for Akris to calibrate exposure. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes ADA plaintiffs can prevail via default/injunction even without fee award certainty, shaping likely trajectory here. Main risk: Attorney's fee entitlement may be contested or reduced even if injunctive relief is granted, per Price v. Diab's partial reversal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$50K Extremely thin comparable set (one policy memo, one circuit ruling); no direct ADA website-access settlement data for calibration. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-09 | $2K–$50K rough EV |