C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-08777
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gts Franchising LLCsource ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · No. 2:26-cv-08777 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs can recover fees even via default judgment, favoring plaintiff persistence, but the OLC ECOA opinion (different statute) offers no direct precedent here. Small comparable set limits reliable pattern-matching. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes prevailing-party fee entitlement even absent contested litigation, raising defendant's cost exposure. Main risk: Single-plaintiff ADA suits rarely yield large damages (injunctive relief only); Unruh Act statutory add-on may be the real driver of value. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$22K No settlement or verdict data for this defendant or theory; estimate relies on generic CA ADA/Unruh litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-07 | $2K–$22K rough EV |