C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-08774
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcon Lighting, Inc.source ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · No. 2:26-cv-08774 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab shows 9th Cir. supports fee-shifting for plaintiffs winning ADA default judgments, favoring early settlement; but sample is thin and one comparable (ECOA/OLC) is irrelevant to ADA merits. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms prevailing ADA plaintiffs recover attorney's fees, raising defendant's settlement pressure even absent merits ruling. Main risk: Lack of on-point merits rulings; case could be dismissed for mootness if defendant remediates access barrier quickly, as often occurs in ADA website suits. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4K–$15K Extremely limited comparable set; no direct settlement data for this defendant or theory subtype (physical vs. website access unclear). · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-07 | $4K–$15K rough EV |