E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01269
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regions Bank Inc.source ↗ filed by MAYNARD NEXSEN, PC Birmingham · No. 4:26-cv-01269 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split: Bayhealth confidentiality claim survived MTD, Gunnar Optiks BIPA claim survived on remand, but Integris and LabCorp claims were dismissed or unclear on similar disclosure theories. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google Assistant $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality duty survived MTD, supports Regions Bank facing similar wiretap/privacy claim exposure. Main risk: Dismissal on threshold consent/interception elements, as seen in LabCorp's narrow statutory reading and Integris's unclear state-law outcome Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $29M–$90M Small comparable sample, no prior Regions Bank cases, and class size is estimated from branch count not confirmed customer data. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Mo. | 2026-08-07 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |