M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-01724
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darden Concepts, Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA · No. 6:26-cv-01724 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable rulings are not directly on-point (ECOA disparate-impact and ADA fee-shifting in default judgment context), limiting predictive value. ADA Title III claims yield only injunctive relief and fees, not damages, so financial exposure is modest but litigation risk persists per Price v. Diab on fee entitlement. Key precedent: Price v. Diab establishes that even default/injunctive ADA outcomes can trigger prevailing-party fee awards, raising defendant's cost exposure. Main risk: No compensatory damages under ADA Title III; recovery limited to injunctive relief plus attorney's fees, capping plaintiff upside Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Comparables are only tangentially related; no settlement or verdict data specific to ADA accessibility against this defendant exists. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-08-07 | $2K–$10K rough EV |