E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01266
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Security of America, Inc.source ↗ filed by HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP St. Louis · Judge Henry Edward Autrey · No. 4:26-cv-01266 · 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $28M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall claims often survive MTD when pled as straightforward non-consensual calls (League of Women Voters v. Kramer), but circuit courts have narrowed liability via technical carve-outs (Howard's 'begins with' prerecorded voice test, Perrong's legislative exception, Hulce's 'telephone solicitation' definition) that could apply depending on call content. Comparable settlements $28M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising $32.42M Key precedent: League of Women Voters v. Kramer (D.N.H.) — MTD denied for standard non-consensual robocall claims, most factually analogous to a straightforward TCPA text/robocall case like this one. Main risk: Dismissal on technical definitional grounds (e.g., whether texts/calls used an 'artificial or prerecorded voice' per Howard v. RNC) if HSA's calls don't meet the narrow statutory trigger. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$11.25M No prior HSA litigation history, no confirmed class size or call volume data; estimates rely on industry-size inference and small comparable sample, so wide uncertainty bands apply. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Mo. | 2026-08-07 | $28M–$76M comparable settlements |