E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05662
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.source ↗ filed by Keller Postman LLC · Judge John F. Murphy · No. 2:26-cv-05662 · 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparables split: Bayhealth found a duty of confidentiality survived MTD, while Integris saw removal rejected but underlying privacy claims left 'unclear'; Clements shows even favorable outcomes require factual development before certification. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google Assistant $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Class (from complaint): Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund on behalf of itself and others similarly situated who purchased or paid for Combivent Respimat and/or Spiriva Resp Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on healthcare-provider tracking disclosure, closest fact pattern to pharma website/patient data tracking claims. Main risk: Dismissal at pleading stage on causation/consent grounds, as seen in Integris Health where state privacy claims remained unresolved and federal hooks failed. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.45M–$30M Small comparable sample, no confirmed class size or program enrollment data for BI; six parallel filings suggest coordinated litigation that could shift outcome via consolidation or early settlement. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-07 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |