S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06769
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Sunwear of California, LLCsource ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-06769 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits in S.D.N.Y. often survive motion-to-dismiss stage, as suggested by Price v. Diab's affirmance of injunctive relief; however, fee-entitlement issues remain contested and no direct PacSun precedent exists. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows courts favor injunctive relief for ADA plaintiffs but scrutinize fee awards, relevant to likely relief sought here. Main risk: Court may find mootness if defendant remediates access barriers before ruling, as often occurs in ADA website cases. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$35K Single comparable set is sparse and non-analogous (ECOA, 9th Cir. ADA fee case); no PacSun-specific or SDNY-specific rulings available. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-07 | $5K–$35K rough EV |