E.D. Pa. · No. 5:26-cv-05610
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P&B CAPITAL GROUP, LLCsource ↗ filed by Perrong Law LLC · Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl · No. 5:26-cv-05610 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $28M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall claims split in comparables: Howard, Perrong, and Hulce were dismissed on narrow statutory/actor-specific grounds, while League of Women Voters survived a motion to dismiss on similar robocall theory. P&B Capital is a small debt-recovery firm, not a major national defendant, limiting settlement scale. Comparable settlements $28M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising $32.42M Key precedent: League of Women Voters v. Kramer (D.N.H.) - MTD denied on TCPA robocall claim, showing basic non-consent robocall theories can survive. Main risk: Dismissal on technical TCPA definitional grounds (e.g., Hulce - calls not 'telephone solicitations', or Howard - artificial voice threshold) could gut claims early This defendant: Prior TCPA filing (Weingrad v. P&B Capital) suggests repeat exposure/pattern of alleged robocall practices Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $10K–$900K Small sample of rulings, defendant size inferred from web signals only, no confirmed call volume or complaint specifics · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-06 | $28M–$76M comparable settlements |