S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06747
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Jewelry New York, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06747 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III suits rarely yield damages, only injunctive relief and fees; Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting availability but underscores no monetary damages track. No settlements or verdicts on this theory are in the record. Key precedent: Price v. Diab - establishes fee-shifting for prevailing ADA plaintiffs, relevant since recovery here likely centers on fees/injunction, not damages. Main risk: Case may be mooted by remediation or dismissed for lack of standing/injury, as ADA Title III suits often are. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$20K Comparables are not squarely on ADA accessibility merits; estimate highly speculative given sparse data. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-07 | –$20K rough EV |