D.N.J. · No. 3:26-cv-09977
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM, INC.source ↗ filed by Radic Law Firm, P.C. · No. 3:26-cv-09977 · 15:2 Antitrust Litigation · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $3.50M–$34B ▾No antitrust/price-fixing rulings exist for Amazon in our database, so precedent is thin; comparable price-fixing settlements (Visa/Mastercard $34B, BCBS $2.67B) show huge variance driven by market structure, not litigation strength. Amazon's dominant marketplace position could support a large class but antitrust conspiracy claims face a high Twombly pleading bar absent direct evidence of collusion. Comparable settlements $3.50M–$34B median $100.50M · n=10 Visa and Mastercar $34B · Blue Cross Blue Sh $2.67B · Discover $1.23B Per member (realized): ~$10 median · $10–$10 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Chinese vitamin C ma $54.10M · Two Chinese vitamin $54.10M Key precedent: FTC v. Amazon.com ($2.5B settlement) shows Amazon will settle large-scale consumer-harm claims rather than litigate to judgment, informing settlement posture here. Main risk: Antitrust price-fixing claims require plausible allegations of concerted action (Twombly); without direct evidence, dismissal risk is high, unlike per se card-network cases with clear network agreements. This defendant: Amazon has a pattern of large regulatory settlements (FTC $2.5B) rather than proceeding to trial on consumer-harm claims. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $250M–$7.50B Extremely thin precedent base (n=0 rulings, n=1 per-member anchor); estimates are order-of-magnitude only, not case-specific projections. · grounded in 0 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Antitrust / Price-Fixing | D.N.J. | 2026-08-06 | $3.50M–$34B comparable settlements |