E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-mc-00071
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe Systems, Inc.source ↗ filed by Goodman Schwartz & Shaw LLC · Judge Wendy Beetlestone · No. 2:26-mc-00071 · Civil Miscellaneous Case · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾{
"outlook": "mixed",
"confidence": "low",
"rationale": "Comparable rulings split: Bayhealth allowed a confidentiality claim from tracking tech to survive, and Gunnar Optiks BIPA claims were revived on appeal, but Integris Health's state privacy claims remain 'unclear' post-remand and LabCorp shows fraud-based privacy theories face doctrinal hurdles. No wiretap-specific ruling squarely favor Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google Assistant $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-04 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |