D. Maryland · No. 1:26-cv-03070
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Children's Health System, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gohn Hankey & Berlage, LLP · Judge James Kelleher Bredar · No. 1:26-cv-03070 · 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split: Bayhealth allowed confidentiality claims from tracking tech to survive, while Integris saw state privacy claims remain unclear after remand; Gunnar Optiks shows courts resist dismissing tracking/data claims on the pleadings. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $68M · Google Assistant $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider tracking-technology disclosure claim survived MTD, closely analogous to a hospital system defendant. Main risk: Federal officer removal/jurisdictional maneuvering (as in Integris) or dismissal on causation/standing grounds could truncate claims early. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1M–$12M Small comparable sample, no defendant-specific settlement history, and class size is estimated from indirect web signals, not confirmed patient records. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Maryland | 2026-08-05 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |