S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06683
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile Northeast LLCsource ↗ filed by The Marks Law Firm, PC · No. 1:26-cv-06683 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA accessibility claims can survive to judgment and support injunctive relief, but fee entitlement remains contested even after prevailing; the OLC ruling is off-point (ECOA disparate-impact) and offers little direct guidance for ADA claims. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows ADA accessibility plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief via default judgment, but fee-shifting recovery is not guaranteed. Main risk: Title III ADA claims permit only injunctive relief, not damages, capping monetary exposure absent pendent NYCHRL/NYSHRL claims. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$250K Extremely thin comparable set (2 rulings, no settlements/verdicts); estimates rely on general ADA litigation norms, not case-specific data. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-05 | –$250K rough EV |