S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06678
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hollow Alpaca Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06678 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab shows ADA accessibility claims can succeed to default judgment, but fee-shifting entitlement was reversed, showing courts scrutinize remedies closely. The ECOA OLC opinion is irrelevant to ADA theory, weakening comparability. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA accessibility claims can prevail via default judgment but limits automatic fee awards. Main risk: Small e-commerce defendant may lack resources; case could resolve cheaply or be dismissed for lack of standing/mootness as in many ADA tester suits Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$50K Small, low-comparable dataset; no direct ADA settlement data, figures are inferred from analogous accessibility litigation patterns. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-05 | $2K–$50K rough EV |