S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25252
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Yankee Candle Company, Inc.source ↗ filed by The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A., the Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A. · Judge Rodolfo Armando Ruiz II · No. 1:26-cv-25252 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief can be 'prevailing parties' eligible for fees, supporting viability of accessibility claims, but the ECOA OLC opinion is inapposite and offers no real guidance here. Small, mixed sample limits confidence in outcome prediction. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — establishes that even default/injunction-only ADA outcomes support fee-shifting, incentivizing filing and early settlement. Main risk: ADA Title III provides no compensatory/statutory damages—only injunctive relief and fees—capping monetary exposure regardless of class size. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$20K No settlement or verdict data specific to ADA accessibility exists in this dataset; estimate relies on general market knowledge of Title III suits, not case-specific comparables. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-04 | $2K–$20K rough EV |