S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06648
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moncler USA, Inc.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06648 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are thin and mostly off-point (ECOA disparate-impact, ADA fee-shifting on default judgment); Price v. Diab shows courts award fees/injunctive relief once liability is found, suggesting survival risk skews toward plaintiff on procedural grounds. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms ADA plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief recover fees, raising defendant's exposure even without damages verdict. Main risk: ADA Title III alone caps relief to injunctive/fees (no damages), limiting per-member recovery unless NY state/city human rights claims are pled for compensatory damages. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$3.75M No settlement or verdict data specific to Moncler or ADA website-accessibility retail cases; estimate highly speculative pending class/individual determination. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-04 | $5K–$3.75M rough EV |