S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06647
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lacoste USA, Inc.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06647 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and fees even via default, but ADA Title III itself provides no compensatory damages, limiting monetary exposure absent parallel state claims. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - establishes fee-shifting recovery path for ADA plaintiffs even without contested litigation, relevant to likely resolution path here. Main risk: Case may be single-plaintiff/tester suit seeking injunctive relief only, with no compensable damages class under federal ADA absent NYSHRL/NYCHRL claims. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$125K No settlement or verdict data specific to this theory/defendant; estimate relies on analogous ADA fee-shifting and state-law damages patterns. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-04 | –$125K rough EV |