S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06641
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoogue, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06641 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Only loosely relevant comparables exist; Price v. Diab confirms ADA fee-shifting survives even on default judgment, suggesting plaintiffs can recover fees regardless of outcome. No direct web-accessibility ADA rulings or settlements are in the sample, so litigation posture is speculative. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms prevailing-party fee entitlement under ADA §12205, raising defendant's cost exposure even without damages. Main risk: ADA Title III provides no compensatory damages, only injunctive relief and fees, capping monetary exposure absent pendent state claims (e.g., NYCHRL). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$100K Sample lacks direct ADA web-accessibility rulings/settlements; figures are extrapolated from adjacent statutory frameworks and defendant size, not case-specific data. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-04 | –$100K rough EV |