M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02247
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEASONS BELLEAIR, LLC d/b/a SEASONS BELLEAIR MEMORY CAREsource ↗ filed by The Law Office of Tanesha Walls Blye, PLLC, Litigation · No. 8:26-cv-02247 · 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$68M ▾Healthcare-context privacy claims show a split: Bayhealth's breach-of-confidentiality claim survived on provider-duty theory, while Integris's parallel state privacy claims remained unresolved on remand and BIPA claims required factual development rather than outright dismissal. Seasons Belleair, as a memory-care facility handling vulnerable residents' data/communications, fits the healthcare-duty framework that helped Bayhealth survive. Comparable settlements $30M–$68M median $59.50M · n=10 Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M · Google $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — closest analog; healthcare provider's confidentiality duty to patients supports survival of privacy/wiretap claims against a care facility. Main risk: Dismissal on consent/one-party-consent grounds or failure to show 'communication' was intercepted, similar to unresolved BIPA factual gaps in Clements v. Gunnar Optiks. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$4K Comparables are mega-platform privacy settlements/verdicts vastly larger in scale than a single senior-care facility; figures are rough directional estimates, not calibrated to this defendant's size. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-08-03 | $30M–$68M comparable settlements |