S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25224
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imeca Franchise, LLCsource ↗ filed by The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A., the Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A. · No. 1:26-cv-25224 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits in S.D. Fla. rarely survive motion practice absent standing/mootness cure, but Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting persists even via default judgment. Comparables are thin and largely off-point (ECOA disparate-impact opinion is not analogous). Key precedent: Price v. Diab - confirms prevailing ADA plaintiffs recover attorney's fees even on default judgment, raising defendant's exposure beyond mere injunctive compliance. Main risk: Mootness/voluntary remediation defense common in S.D. Fla. ADA suits could moot claims before damages accrue, as these cases seek injunctive relief not damages. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Single-plaintiff ADA suits yield no per-class-member damages; EV reflects fee-shifting exposure, not statutory payout, and rests on sparse, tangential comparables. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-03 | $2K–$10K rough EV |