E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05466
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRYKO PARTNERS, LLCsource ↗ filed by Hardin Thompson Pc · No. 2:26-cv-05466 · 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $87.50M–$436M ▾False-advertising claims in analogous consumer cases show mixed outcomes: Cortez Gomez v. Kohl's saw a core pricing-deception theory sent to certification rather than resolved, while Guthrie v. Transamerica affirmed denial of class cert due to individualized reliance issues, showing courts scrutinize commonality closely. Comparable settlements $87.50M–$436M median $90M · n=10 Toyota Industries $436M · IM Mastery Academy $90M · Premier Nutrition $90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $20–$20 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M Key precedent: Cortez Gomez v. Kohl's Corp. (7th Cir.) — directly parallels false-advertising pricing claims and shows courts are unsettled on pecuniary-loss theory viability. Main risk: Individualized reliance/damages proof problem, as in Guthrie v. Transamerica, could defeat class certification even if claims survive initial dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $30K–$1.50M Extremely thin data: no prior Tryko litigation history, no confirmed class size, and comparables are only loosely analogous (mixed industries, procedural postures). · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 8 verdicts | Filing | False Advertising | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-03 | $87.50M–$436M comparable settlements |