S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25207
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUMI USA, LLC.source ↗ filed by Brasil Brasil PA · Judge Jose E. Martinez · No. 1:26-cv-25207 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs obtaining injunctive relief can be 'prevailing parties' entitled to fees, supporting survivability of well-pled accessibility claims; but the ECOA ruling is inapposite and no direct Title III merits precedent is in the sample. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes fee-shifting exposure once injunctive relief is granted, raising defendant's settlement incentive. Main risk: S.D. Fla. is a high-volume ADA filing mill jurisdiction; mootness/standing dismissals are common if defendant remediates quickly. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K No settlements or verdicts on this theory in database; estimate relies on general Title III litigation norms, not case-specific data. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-02 | $2K–$10K rough EV |