← Records

Philip v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.

E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-05421

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.source ↗
filed by Keches Law Group · No. 2:26-cv-05421 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $30M–$68M ▾
Bayhealth Medical Ctr. survived a similar breach-of-confidentiality claim over tracking technologies, but Integris Health shows state privacy claims on health-data sharing remain 'unclear' post-remand. Wiretap/privacy claims against hospitals for pixel/tracking tech are inconsistently resolved at the pleading stage.
Comparable settlements $30M–$68M median $59.50M · n=10
Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M · Google $68M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=4)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on breach of confidentiality via tracking tech, closely mirrors Temple's likely pixel-based privacy theory.
Main risk: Integris Health-style dismissal of state privacy claims for lack of clear unauthorized disclosure or causation
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.25M–$8.25M
Small comparable sample; no prior Temple-specific rulings; class size is estimated, not confirmed. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapE.D. Pa.2026-07-31$30M–$68M
comparable settlements