S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06565
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richemont North America, Inc.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06565 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are indirect: Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs recover attorney's fees even via default judgment, encouraging suits, but no direct accessibility-merits ruling here; ECOA comparable is inapposite doctrinally. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - shows ADA fee-shifting favors plaintiffs, raising settlement pressure even without merits win. Main risk: Title III ADA claims allow only injunctive relief/fees, not damages, capping monetary exposure absent state-law claims (e.g., NYC Human Rights Law). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$20K No direct settlement/verdict data for this defendant or theory; estimate relies on general ADA web-accessibility litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-31 | $2K–$20K rough EV |