S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25171
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul & Shark, U.S.A., Inc.source ↗ filed by Adams & Associates, P.A. · Judge Jacqueline Becerra · No. 1:26-cv-25171 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting risk once injunctive relief is granted, but S.D. Fla. ADA website/access suits face frequent standing and mootness dismissals; comparable set is thin and mostly off-topic (ECOA ruling irrelevant). Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - establishes prevailing-party fee entitlement after injunctive relief, raising defendant's exposure even absent damages. Main risk: Early dismissal for lack of standing/mootness if defendant remediates access barrier before ruling, per common S.D. Fla. practice Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$8K Small, non-analogous comparable set; ADA Title III yields no compensatory damages, so EV reflects fee/settlement exposure only, not per-class-member payout. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-07-31 | $2K–$8K rough EV |