S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06547
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dg Buyer, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06547 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting incentives that drive high ADA filing volume, but the OLC opinion shows courts require clear textual/intent basis for liability, cutting against broad theories. No direct accessibility-merits ruling here limits precision. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes that even default judgments trigger prevailing-party fee awards, encouraging plaintiff-side ADA suits like this one. Main risk: Lack of standing or mootness if defendant remediates site quickly, a common ADA Title III defense not addressed in these comps. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$50K Extremely limited comparable data; no direct accessibility merits rulings or settlements for this defendant or theory in S.D.N.Y. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-30 | $2K–$50K rough EV |