S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06498
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mochithings, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06498 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are weakly analogous (ECOA disparate-impact and ADA fee-shifting rulings), not direct web-accessibility precedent; Price v. Diab shows ADA plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and fees even via default, suggesting plaintiff-favorable procedural posture in S.D.N.Y. accessibility suits. Class (from complaint): Consumers who purchased Mochi products from Mochithings, LLC during the applicable class period. Key precedent: Price v. Diab: confirms ADA plaintiffs obtaining injunctive relief can be 'prevailing parties' entitled to fees, raising defendant's litigation cost exposure. Main risk: Title III ADA claims allow no compensatory damages, so exposure is largely fee-shifting and remediation costs, not per-member payouts, per Price v. Diab's fee-focused analysis. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$5M No direct ADA web-accessibility comparables, settlement data, or defendant history exist; estimates rely on generic ADA litigation patterns, not case-specific evidence. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-30 | –$5M rough EV |